One of the skills my wife the professor and her colleagues attempt to develop in her voice students is the ability to learn how to sing from sheet music. It’s not easy. It requires piano skills, the ability to sight-read music, the ability to pronounce foreign words (which they’re theoretically required to develop by using the international phonetic alphabet), working out the timing and breathing to fit their own voice, and a great deal of hard work. Most students resist doing the work. Instead, they find a UTube video of the piece and sing along until they think they’ve learned the piece.
Except… they haven’t. Many of them won’t even study the lyrics, even when the words are in English, at least until prompted, because they don’t even consider how they’re going to convey emotion, particularly in a foreign language, if they don’t understand the full meaning of the words.
That’s just the beginning. Even if they find a video sung by a truly great singer, it doesn’t that mean that particular version suits the student’s voice, especially if the student is young and the recorded singer is fully mature. It also doesn’t take into account that even good singers make mistakes, or the fact that even accurate copies are less vital and accurate than the original. Add to that that “copying” a range of singers will keep the student from truly developing their own voice.
And, of course, there’s the “small” problem that the student can’t learn music that someone else hasn’t already recorded, not to mention that not all recordings, especially off UTube, aren’t that good.
But “copying” is so much easier.
Unhappily, this tendency isn’t confined to would-be classical singers. All one has to do is listen to current pop singers. Until about twenty-five or thirty years ago, listeners could identify singers within a few bars. Now, the majority all sound the same.
The “copy culture” isn’t limited to music, either. There’s rough “copying” in writing as well. The advent of the computer, combined with the internet, has spawned widespread and persistent plagiarism. At the same time, I’m seeing more and more grammatical and technical errors in commercial and semi-commercial material appearing on the internet, suggesting a lack of basic technique.
One of the reasons why I wrote the first Recluce novel [The Magic of Recluce] was because all too many fantasy novels at that time were set in pseudo-medieval cultures and the magic systems were largely based on spells or tradition folk magic, and I didn’t feel like “copying.” That’s also why each of my fantasy series has a unique magic system.
But because the “copy culture” is far cheaper than good solid originality, it’s growing and invading everywhere. And what does that say about society?
I hear you LEM. But in modern societies this has always been true. Innovation is, by definition, rare. It always has been and always will be. There are a lot of people out there and they have to have a way to live and thrive. The most common path is to take the common path. Regression to the mean and all that. That’s just the way it is. Most of the things you buy are all copies of something that was originally a new idea or an innovation on an older idea.
In terms of learning something new, I wholeheartedly agree that it is best if people worked hard in learning the basics before proclaiming competency or proficiency. But, life is not like Lake Wobegon where all the children are above average. :-))
REM, thanks for another thoughtful entry. I’m glad to have a chance to support a favorite author!
Meanwhile, you just may have identified one of the underlying reasons behind Sturgeon’s Law…
Yes, it’s only going to get worse with things like ChatGPT. It’s trained to copy. Then it’s trained not to reproduce the exact same words, but the same argument, thereby “avoiding” copyright violations. And then people think it’s intelligent… because in a world where they all copy, it behaves just like them.