A while back I commented on the fact that one of the problems with all the education “reformers” was that virtually all the rhetoric and the effort was concentrated on teachers and schools, but primarily upon teachers. In recent weeks, there have been new programs, press interviews with the Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, and the national head of the teachers’ union, not to mention all sorts of other commentary to coincide with the beginning of the new school year. And what do we continue to hear? It’s all about how getting better and more inspiring teachers will improve education.
Who can disagree with that?
Except… it’s only focusing on half the problem. It’s like saying that a good coach will always have a good team, no matter what sort of players the coach has, no matter what their background and motivation are. That is, pardon me, bullshit. Good teams require good coaches and good players. Likewise, good education requires good teachers and good students, and unlike coaches, teachers don’t have the luxury of selecting and educating only the best students. Putting all the focus on teachers, especially at a time when teachers have less and less respect from students and parents and, frankly, fewer and fewer tools to maintain discipline in a culture that has multiplied manifold the possible distractions and student problems, is not only unrealistic, but short-sighted. Placing all the responsibility on the teachers is, however, far more politically and personally attractive than addressing the “student problem.”
What almost all of these “reformers” overlook are some of the key reasons why private schools and the best charter schools have better records in improving student performance. In addition to better teachers, the parents are more involved, and they play a far greater role in demanding more of their children. In addition, disruptive and disinterested students can be dealt with, and removed if they don’t improve their behavior. In short, they deal with student motivation and aspiration, and provide a supportive and disciplined structure for learning.
The other problem in focusing on teachers is that the growing emphasis is on test scores and their improvement. Teachers tend to oppose this focus – and for very good reasons. No matter how good the teacher, a classroom composed of inner-city students with poor educational backgrounds and difficult personal situations will not progress as fast as one composed of the best and most highly motivated students in the school. How do you measure what progress represents a “good” teacher? It’s easy enough to determine a terrible teacher, but an excellent teacher may put more effort and skill into creating a modest improvement with a difficult class while a competent teacher may show greater improvement with a less educationally-challenged class.
In addition, excessive test-oriented teacher evaluation creates pressures to “teach to the tests,” rather than pressure to teach students how to learn. This further emphasizes teacher behavior and test-related causality, rather than dealing with the long-term needs and requirements of the students.
So… when are we as a society, especially the educational reformers, going to address the entire spectrum of problems with education, rather than placing the entire responsibility on the teachers?